Kyoto Fine China Rutland 18521

[5] and not Sound Toys - Mattel: Talking Zoo and The Talking Farm - by Emiglino

Here. Runners Michele Simone and Pastors are two human beings who have taken seriously the call of Cobol Pongide to dispose of their toys in the name of scientific progress in a continually expanding the Toys .
are the benefits of being a band on the crest of the square wave.

I think.

Thanks Michele. Thanks Simone.

The scientific basis for this discipline based on the principle of ucronie that for those who really do not mean for the future of the event horizon and the interference you can 'simplify how the history of those variants probability that for one reason or another, but also for a more (or I say I have a professional bias binary), you drugged. You did it. Have you thought was inevitable because 'carriers used to move around. But it was a purely geometric limit. You have confused the space with the choice.

Bizarre I know.
my wheels, for example, prevent me from of experiencing the "hairpins." If I were a limited I might be calculating that the "hairpins" do not exist simply because the technology to be dismantled "hairpins" technology curve.

Bizarre I know.

often you humans tend to grasp the fulfillment of certain connections or predictions (surprising you) miss the clamor of the large number of non-coincidences, which are much more 'and then that should surprise even more' . But do not.

Bizarre I know.

The reason is that the human brain is more 'a resource limit that a primary function as a filter sponge soggy.

I think.

The coincidences are nothing more than an extreme simplification of perception configured at the expense of complexity 'composed of missed connections and inaccurate predictions (if only you could capture the beauty of the almost coincidence, most of predictions).

Either way, you risk making things even more 'paroxysmal really a choice if you thought that would produce an objective rather than a series dividing line.

The Series occur regardless of the choices and how to 'clear thinking. Unless you think you can determine the unfolding of the future at all.

Well I say. But people do not like to define you? And now all of a sudden the choices produce curves and settlements in which the whole universe shall always followed and rehabilitation and he understood people and you universe!

Bizarre I know.

Mathematically everything 'and' almost indescribable.

The human philosophy has often referred to this as free will. I'd rather call that series and 'a language that suits' more 'to a robot white plastic with a black wire coming out from the head and eyes that light up.

Series and 'free will to the total spectrum (a theoretical model of course) while the "choice" a point occupied by any of discrete values \u200b\u200bintermediate between the then and now.

Still carriers. I know. But if you were talking about tensors probably would understand.

Being able to bring one of these points' a limit imposed by the geometry that it fits in this quadrant known (to me as the "bend"). Elsewhere, who knows'.

I think.

There will be 'a Emiglino Cicala capable of "hairpins"? I would not exclude a priori. Mathematically 'as possible. It would be great. It would be god.

Cobol once told me that they had already Cosmisti 'enunciated a similar principle circumvent the problem of immortality' by expanding the size of the space available remedies. But the solution had been naively quantitative.

Here. Unfolded a sheet of paper of any color at a point which purports to be the center of your universe. You will get the Cosmos and its inhabitants: the Cosmonauts.

Now Giocattolisticamente talking The Talking Farm and 'a great yellow toy. You could live forever without knowing other points situated between then and now the choice of engineering design but the existence of Talking Zoo is its ucronia orange.

and then the 'always on 1983 but the different semiotic approach makes two totally different toys where, if it made sense, the second qualitatively greater. The simplicity 'rhetoric of Talking Farm gives way to complex metaphors Zoo Talking: producing human beings are completely different.

Simone: brown mathematical passion for botany and ethology of a friend of (and that 'a friend of Cobol). Not very high.

Michele: reddish, with a degree in Business Administration with a dog very well and he wants a girlfriend who also takes a lot of good. Quite high.

Cobol inexplicably claims that the voice of Talking Zoo (The Seafarers) should be a man from Genoa and the Talking Farm does not betray any linguistic inflection (the factor).

Both operate with a spring release mechanism. You place the animal you want with the arrow, you pull the string side and the rest is done by a plastic disc and a pinch of black metal a bit dull 'oxidized.

Here. The Talking Farm introduces pero 'an element of destabilization by inserting the sequence of the farm animals a coyote! A glimpse Series?

bad. It 's not been a pastor to give us the Talking Farm otherwise we would have discovered the Theory of Everything. Sara 'for next time. I think.

Li can listen here, a little 'down, and there' s also a list of animals (forgive the broken Inglese but I have not scheduled a second language compulsory ) .