Highlights On Dark Hair

City of Santa Maria Capua Vetere - Replica of stars Giudicianni:

"This attitude is incomprehensible and unjustified on the facts as they are not interested. The good of the city? The city's priorities seem to be completely disregarded. "

"For me, the conduct and statements by the Mayor of Santa Maria Capua Vetere, dr. Giancarlo Giudicianni, are totally incomprehensible and deprived of any attachment to material facts in any way related to me.

I always thought that the Administration should work in coordination with the political forces and in particular with the party who wanted to organize into unions of Giudicianni.

then I am unable to understand what is the good of the city referred to by the Mayor and that could be pursued only in my absence. The tools of my limited knowledge and capacity for logic do not allow me to peer into the depths of another's human thought.

There is no doubt however that the lawyer Pappadà, representing, among others, one of the best energies of the entire city council. Choices about who has worked in the council were and are the result of careful consideration of the case relating to the property via Latin, although it has been able to investigate the whole matter I would not criticize or disapprove of the evaluation that has Pappadà because of the acts and conduct administrative undoubtedly confused and certainly not the result of a management of the most clear and straightforward " .

If I am not mistaken and if I understand - continues Stellato - were allocated funds for a transaction with Banco di Napoli, recovering from the residual assets of the budget and not through an ignition of the mortgage, as originally planned. In that situation probably would have been reviewed the reasons for a decision about that transaction, then the whole in relation to a matter that already years ago was the subject of criminal sentence.

I do not feel in equal measure to express any reservations on the attitude of those, evidently on the basis of other considerations unknown to me, decided to speak favorably to the proposed resolution. In any case, it was still a free and independent choice of a city councilman - even particularly close to me - that has nothing to do with the political relations between the various institutions, such as the mayor on one side and the subscribed, the regional adviser on the other. With regard to the Auditor, dr. Vincenzo Carusone, I do not think this has ever lose its institutional duties, had always expressed its opinion in the correct way, similarly to what has been done by other members of the Board. I do not think, however, that invitations to be correct horas organ of a technical nature.

This, indeed, I would almost think that it has instead been a pretext seized upon, but certainly is just a guess, probably unfounded.

For the rest, what to say, I never doubted that any mayor, even the most inexperienced, may wish to work for the good of the city. The basic problem is to understand what is meant by "good of the city " and especially How is it to pursue it. The priorities, in our opinion, are called school, services, employment, living, business, public parks and just do not know how many and which of these initiatives are in progress in this direction, given the extreme incompleteness of information coming from this administration . The subjective impressions then, I do not affect, at least not in this context " .